Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Blueprint for Children?s Health and the Built Environment
Presented by the Children's Environmental Health Institute

Green Chemistry & Environmental Health

Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 107, Number 6, June 1999 Open Access
spacer
Calculating the Interindividual Geometric Standard Deviation for Use in the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children

Susan Griffin,1 Allan Marcus,2 Terry Schulz,3 and Susan Walker4

1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, Denver, Colorado, USA
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
3Golden, Colorado, USA
4AGEISS Environmental, Inc., Denver, Colorado, USA

Abstract

The integrated exposure uptake biokinetic (IEUBK) model, recommended for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at residential Superfund sites to predict potential risks to children from lead exposure and to establish lead remediation levels, requires an interindividual geometric standard deviation (GSDi) as an essential input parameter. The GSDi quantifies the variability of blood lead concentrations for children exposed to similar environmental concentrations of lead. Estimates of potential risks are directly related to the GSDi, and therefore the GSDi directly impacts the scope of remediation at Superfund sites. Site-specific GSDi can be calculated for sites where blood lead and environmental lead have been measured. This paper uses data from blood and environmental lead studies conducted at the Bingham Creek and Sandy, Utah, Superfund sites to calculate GSDi using regression modeling, box modeling, and structural equation modeling. GSDis were calculated using various methods for treating values below the analytical method detection and quantitation limits. Treatment of nonquantifiable blood lead concentrations affected the GSDi more than the statistical method used to calculate the GSDi. For any given treatment, the different statistical methods produced similar GSDis. Because of the uncertainties associated with data in the blood lead studies, we recommend that a range of GSDis be used when analyzing site-specific risks associated with exposure to environmental lead instead of a single estimate. Because the different statistical methods produce similar GSDis, we recommend a simple procedure to calculate site-specific GSDi from a scientifically sound blood and environmental lead study. Key words: , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 107:481-487 (1999) . [Online 6 May 1999]

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1999/107p481-487griffin/ abstract.html

Address correspondence to S. Walker, AGEISS Environmental, Inc., 1900 Grant Street, Suite 1130, Denver, CO 80202 USA. Telephone: (303) 861-7558. Fax: (303) 861-7546. E-mail: susanw@ageiss.com

Any views or opinions expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent U.S. EPA policy or guidance. No official endorsement should be inferred.

Received 9 March 1998 ; accepted 2 October 1998.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov