- Full (HTML) - Related EHP Articles - PubMed:Related Articles - PubMed:Citation - Cited in PMC - Purchase This Issue

Renee Dufault,¹ Eric Abelquist,² Steven Crooks,³ Don Demers,¹ Lou DiBerardinis,⁴ Tom Franklin,⁵ Marty Horowitz,⁶ Colleen Petullo,⁷ and Glenn Sturchio⁸

¹United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA; ²Oakridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA; ³Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; ⁴Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; ⁵United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, USA; ⁶Analog Devices, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; ⁷United States Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; ⁸Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

The need for more or less space is a common laboratory problem. Solutions may include renovating existing space, leaving or demolishing old space, or acquiring new space or property for building. All of these options carry potential environmental risk. Such risk can be the result of activities related to the laboratory facility or property (e.g., asbestos, underground storage tanks, lead paint) , or the research associated with it (e.g., radioactive, microbiological, and chemical contamination) . Regardless of the option chosen to solve the space problem, the potential environmental risk must be mitigated and the laboratory space and/or property must be decommissioned or rendered safe prior to any renovation, demolition, or property transfer activities. Not mitigating the environmental risk through a decommissioning process can incur significant financial liability for any costs associated with future decommissioning cleanup activities. Out of necessity, a functioning system, environmental due diligence auditing, has evolved over time to assess environmental risk and reduce associated financial liability. This system involves a 4-phase approach to identify, document, manage, and clean up areas of environmental concern or liability, including contamination. Environmental due diligence auditing includes a) historical site assessment, b) characterization assessment, c) remedial effort and d) final status survey. General practice standards from the American Society for Testing and Materials are available for conducting the first two phases. However, standards have not yet been developed for conducting the third and final phases of the environmental due diligence auditing process. Individuals involved in laboratory decommissioning work in the biomedical research industry consider this a key weakness. Key words: assessment, characterization, decommissioning, decontamination, demolition, environmental, laboratory, liability, remediation, renovation. -- Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 6) :1015-1022 (2000) .

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/suppl-6/1015-1022dufault/abstract.html